A History Lesson for the Modern Media

Boswell found out early on how seriously Dr. Johnson took the English language. Boswell casually "happened to say, it would be terrible if he (Dr. Johnson) should not find a speedy opportunity of returning to London."

Johnson scolded him by saying, "Don't, Sir, accustom yourself to use big words for little matters. It would not be terrible, though I were to be detained some time here. The practice of using words of disproportionate magnitude is, no doubt, too frequent every where..."

The quotation serves as a good lesson for our modern media whether in news, entertainment, or commercials. The culture is rife with the "greatest," "most fabulous," "never before seen" use of words that are disproportionate with the magnitude of the event.

What used to be the province of carnival barkers is now a daily insult to the intelligence of the TV audience. All in hopes of making a mediocre event much greater than it is.

Spain Rapes the Inca Empire

Histroy records not only great and daring deeds, but misdeeds as well. Francisco Pizarro, of all the Spanish Conquistadors, was the most ruthless. That fact is demonstrated in this story of his first dramatic encounter with the Incas, one of the more advanced civilizations in the New World.

Pizarro had arranged a meeting with the Inca emperor, Atahuallpa. He was not only the monarch of the Incas, he was considered their divine Sun god.

The meeting was held in a Peruvian town called Cajamarca on November 16, 1532. The meeting was held in a plaza of the town. Pizarro had only 168 men with him. The emperor appeared, carried on a litter, with 80,000 men, all unarmed. Pizarro had set a trap for the emperor in the plaza.

On a signal Pizarro's men, on horses, which the Incas had never seen before, attacked. Despite the overwhelming odds in their favor the Incas tried to flee like a panicked mob. Pizarro's men further panicked them by blowing trumpets and attacking them from four directions in the plaza.

The king was kidnapped and held for ransom. The ransom took months to pay and was paid in gold and said to fill a room over 8 feet high, 22 feet long, and 17 feet wide. Once it was paid, Pizarro reneged on his promise and executed the king.

Pizarro brought in massive Spanish reinforcements from Panama during the months it took the Incas to pay the ransom. By the time the Incas decided to fight the Spanish with their cavalry and advance weaponry were easily able to conquer them. It was the beginning of the end of the Inca empire.

Source: Guns, Germs, and Steel by Jared Diamond

Greek Myth # 2-The Great Flood

The Bible is not the only history that contains a Great Flood. Many civilizations have had flood myths, including the Ancient Greeks.

The Greek flood myth that is most famous is based on Metamorphoses by the great ancient Roman poet Ovid. Metamorphoses was Ovid's attempt to compile all ancient Greek myths in a logical order. It turned out to be one of the greatest epic poems of all time.

Not unlike other civilization's flood myths, it involves the divine retribution of a creator against a degenerate human race.

In this myth the human race progresses through 4 ages:
The Golden Age-Truth and right prevailed and there was no need for law. No one had weapons or had to till the soil. Earth produced everything the race needed.
The Silver Age-Since it was not as harmonious, Zeus (or Jupiter for Romans) shortened the spring time, which had been year round, and divided the year into four seasons. The race had to endure extremes of heat and cold for the first time and house itself in caves.
The Brazen Age-Mankind became more savage and began to fight armed battles.
The Iron Age-Crime spread, truth fled. Greed became the dominant force in life and it produced wickeness, cunning and violence.

Zeus was greatly angered and met with the other gods. He told them of his intention to destroy the race and to make a new and better one that would respect the gods. He did it by destroying all of humanity by a great flood. Among all men, he spared only Deucalion, sometimes called the "Greek Noah", the son of Prometheus.

He also spared Deucalion's wife, Pyrrha, as well. They took a boat to the top of Mount Parnassus the only mountain which was not overtopped by the flood. After the flood waters receded they visited a temple to receive guidance on what to do to restore the race. An oracle told them to leave and drop pebbles behind them as they went.

The pebbles dropped by Deucalion turned into men. Those dropped by Pyrrha turned into women. The race was regenerated and we are the hypothetical descendants of this ancient myth.

Source: Bullfinch's Mythology, edited by Richard Martin & The Metamorphoses by Ovid, translated by Horace Gregory.

P.S. If you have a flood myth from an ancient culture you would like to share please send us your comment.

A Famous Samuel Johnson Quotation

I said in my very first post that I admired Samuel Johnson as a leading intellectual in London society. He developed and published the first English Dictionary in 1755. The famous quotation in this post is based on the following events.

A Reverend Dr. William Dodd, a friend of Johnson's, and a theologian, was incarcerated at the famous London Newcastle prison, waiting to be hanged. Due to an extravagant lifestyle he forged a bond in the name of the Earl of Chesterfield, was caught, and sentenced to death.

Prior to his hanging he asked Johnson to write one last letter for him to the King begging for clemency. Johnson agreed to do so but only on the condition that he write it anonymously for Dodd's signature. Dodd agreed. The appeal failed and he was hanged.

Boswell and others, including a Reverend Mr. Seward, didn't believe Dodd capable of writing such an eloquent, though unsuccessful, appeal. In denying authorship to Seward, Dr. Johnson famously said: "Depend upon it, Sir, when a man knows he is to be hanged in a fortnight, it concentrates the mind wonderfully."

Boswell later found evidence, including a 'thank you' letter from Dodd, among Johnson's writing that indicated Johnson had, indeed, written the letter.

Source: The Life of Samuel Johnson, LLD., James Boswell.

Bin-Laden Koran Interpretation Radical but Not Original

Bin-Laden and Zawahiri profess the most extreme of fundamentalist views of the Koran. Neither being a man schooled in the Koran (an imam) it is not surprising that they would adhere to a fundamentalist view of the Koran.

The original founder of their radical interpretation was an Egyptian. His name was Sayyid Qutb. He was a member of the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt in the 1950's and was jailed by Nasser. In jail he formulated the fundamentalist theology that Bin Laden follows today.
He was arrested as part of a conspiracy to kill Nasser and executed in 1966, two years after his release from prison.

Mainstream Islam is frequently mischaracterized in America as a theology based upon hate and warfare. It is just the opposite. The Koran is adamantly opposed to the use of force except in self-defense. It is also tolerant of other religions.

Qutb's fundamentalist interpretation of the Koran, however, stood the sacred scripture on its head. Jihad is not purely a means of self-defense. Rather, it is a struggle to seize power for the good of all humanity. In Qutb's view there could only be toleration after the victory of Islam and the establishment of a true Muslim state.

To Bin Laden, as to Qutb, in the view of Islamic fundamentalism, the world is divided into two camps. One was for God, the other was against Him. It is based on a rejection of secular modernism that is not only to be avoided by devout Muslims, but eliminated by any means.

Due to Bin Laden's heinous acts, it is this violent form of Islam that is now assumed to be the religion of Islam. It is not. It is extremist and viewed that way in the Arab world. That is why Bin Laden is sitting up in the Afghan-Pakistani mountains rather than on a throne.

Source: The Battle for God, Karen Armstrong

How the Plague Arrived in Europe

Bubonic plague, or more eerily known as The Black Death, arrived in Europe in October, 1347 on trading ships owned by merchants from Genoa. The ships had come from the Black Sea area of the Crimea. The sailors aboard the death ships were dead or dying when they landed in Messina in Sicily.

The plague was carried by rats that had stowed aboard the ships in the Crimea. They were infested with black flees which actually carried the plague.

The plague came in two forms. One way the plague was spread was by contact and infected the bloodstream. It killed by causing internal bleeding from large swellings on the body. These swellings were known as buboes. Thus, the "bubonic" plague.

The second way the plague was spread was by respiratory infection. The plague infected the lungs, creating a pneumonia-like condition. Both forms spread rapidly throughout Europe. By 1350, only a little over two years when the plague abated, it had killed one-third of Europe, over 20 million people.

Rumors of the plague abounded before it arrived in Europe. It was believed to have started in China and spread west into India, Persia, Mesopotamia and Egypt. By 1346 over 23 million people were believed to have died from the plague in that area of the world. India was almost totally depopulated.

Medicine was still based mostly on astrology and so was helpless to stop the Black Death. The idea of "infection" or infectious diseases was unknown at the time.

Source: A Distant Mirror, Barbara Tuchman

P.S.-The plague returned intermittently to Europe as late as the 17th century. If you would like to read a great fictional novel about the plague, I highly recommend A Journal of the Plague Year. It was written by Daniel Defoe, also the author of Robinson Crusoe.

The novel is about the plague that broke out in London in the summer of 1665. It killed 100,000 Londoners in one year. It gives a vivid account of what it was like to be quarantined, to have the plague, and for the death carts to pass through the city to collect bodies for mass burials.

A Different View of an "Eye for Eye"

The quotation from Exodus 21:24, "eye for eye, foot for foot..." is often understood to mean that people have a right to revenge an injury to them. This was true in Old Testament times, even though the Gospel of Matthew at 5:38 refers to it and then rejects it at 5:39 ("turn the other cheek") in the New Testament.

What is interesting about the "eye for an eye" quotation, however, is that in Old Testament times it was also meant to put a limit on the amount of vengeance people could take when they suffered at the hands of another.

In ancient times it was customary that if one person from a family killed a person from a different family, the tradition was to kill not only the killer, but also kill everyone in his whole family as well.

So an "eye for an eye" was not only meant to allow for retaliation, but also to limit the extent of the vengeance so that wholesale bloodshed did not occur between families. Vengeance was to be proportional to the harm a person received.

Source: A Short History of Philosophy, Solomon & Higgins